1. Do you agree that when the regulatory easement ends on 30 September 2023, there should be no automatic extension of an on-sales premises licence; anyone wishing to do off-sales should apply to their licensing authority for a variation to their on-sales licence?
2. Should any such amendment to an on-sales licence be treated initially as a minor variation?
3. Should all variation applications automatically be sent to responsible authorities?
4. Should any such amendment to an on-sales licence always be a major variation?
5. Should all new applications for premises licences specify on-sales and off-sales or should they automatically include both?
6. If a premises licence holder also holds a pavement licence for the same venue, should the area covered by the pavement licence be automatically deemed to be included in the area covered by the premises licence?
7. Do you agree that the regulatory easement should be made permanent, meaning that any on-sales premises licence holder is automatically able to do off-sales without any need to amend their licence?
8. If you answered yes to Q7, should it apply to off-sales, take-away or both?
9. Are you aware of any change in the level of crime and / or anti-social behaviour as a result of the off-sales easement?
Please give reasons for any of your answers to the above questions about off-sales.